![]() Perhaps the app is ad-supported, allowing Google to collect bits of your privacy and intrude on your personal life. Since the app is free, it hardly puts food on the table unless perhaps he has a commissioned deal with Google, which would make this highly suspect. Google is the major benefactor here, not the browser developer. This free app allows Google to bypass the app store rules. There's nothing equal about a $2tn company rejecting an app from a developer who is probably part time, trying to put food on the table. It's really disheartening to see Apple's response to the antitrust investigations expose a total lack of awareness for their customers and the developer base, when it's always championed the mantra of equality. The more Apple tightens its control, the more belligerent they appear, and the more likely they are to end up on the sharp end of the antitrust stick. Again Apple's response to a fear that someone might make a couple of dollars outside the App Store is to close them down. Would like to hear what the people who say "just play the games in a browser if they're rejected by Apple" have to say about this, which is just a browser using WebKit, but with controller integration. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |